Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:02:06 -0700
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RPi4B: emmc2bus dma-range handling does not track the boot-time-FDT (u-boot based booting)
Message-ID:  <B3133D77-FA24-4F42-B529-D0B56F48E790@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B3F0409-88F2-4EBD-9C39-37929F973C77@yahoo.com>
References:  <D8BDF95A-D6A8-4E95-A0CE-D53068E8355B.ref@yahoo.com> <D8BDF95A-D6A8-4E95-A0CE-D53068E8355B@yahoo.com> <ABE16EA6-49F1-461F-9B8A-6DAA7ED6A18D@googlemail.com> <98BC985D-EAAB-4AFB-AA8F-7391A45C4EBF@yahoo.com> <91324D35-B66A-4674-AE37-45F3DDB736FD@yahoo.com> <2B3F0409-88F2-4EBD-9C39-37929F973C77@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2020-Oct-8, at 23:01, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 2020-Oct-8, at 21:29, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On 2020-Oct-8, at 20:06, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On 2020-Oct-8, at 06:27, Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2 at =
googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>>> Am 08.10.2020 um 11:01 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm =
<freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> The old u-boot/DTB combination in use does not have emmc2bus.
>>>>> And, even if it did, FreeBSD would not use =E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6=
.
>>>>=20
>>>> =E2=80=A6 and the new 2020.10- combinations will even be more =
annoying=E2=80=A6
>>>> While I meanwhile e.g. could boot the 4GB off of xhci, it hangs in =
DeviceTree,
>>>> Depending on GUESSED ;-) combinations and DeviceTree-patches in src =
.
>>>> There have to be necessary  adjustments which are even not yet =
upstreamed in u-boot=20
>>>> (depending on hw-revisions)=E2=80=A6and so on ...
>>>> I doubt that anyone really will take explicitly time consuming care =
of all that annoying RPI4-crap.
>>>> I don't see any other way than targeting minimum 1 developer(better =
more) ONLY to the RPI-platform=20
>>>> for a  time period=E2=80=A6 other than leaving it crappy as is and =
to be happy that it nevertheless=20
>>>> is a working fbsd-gadget :-)
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Summary of probable-cause finding: u-boot 2020.10 is
>>> expecting:
>>>=20
>>> compatible =3D "brcm,generic-xhci"
>>>=20
>>> instead of what seems to be in files that are in use
>>> by FreeBSD:
>>>=20
>>> compatible =3D "generic-xhci"
>>>=20
>>> (I've no clue what all the other differences in the .dtb
>>> file contents might be.)
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> The details of what I learned that reached that status . . .
>>>=20
>>> I updated my ports environment on a RPi4 to build the final 2020.10 =
u-boot
>>> for the RPi4. I then built it and replaced the u-boot.bin on the =
microsd
>>> card that I boot with via the FreeBSD kernel being from that microsd =
card
>>> but later stages being from the USB3 SSD. I did not update anything =
else.
>>> So: still an older .dtb file.
>>>=20
>>> That 8 GiByte RPi4B context booted just fine.
>>>=20
>>> I then rebooted and had it stop in u-boot and looked around just a =
little
>>> bit.
>>>=20
>>> U-Boot 2020.10 (Oct 09 2020 - 00:51:29 +0000)
>>>=20
>>> DRAM:  7.9 GiB
>>> RPI 4 Model B (0xd03114)
>>> MMC:   mmc@7e300000: 1, emmc2@7e340000: 0
>>> Loading Environment from FAT... In:    serial
>>> Out:   vidconsole
>>> Err:   vidconsole
>>> Net:   eth0: ethernet@7d580000
>>> PCIe BRCM: link up, 5.0 Gbps x1 (SSC)
>>> starting USB...
>>> Bus xhci_pci: probe failed, error -110
>>> No working controllers found
>>> Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0=20
>>>=20
>>> So it reproted the problem above. Yet . . .
>>>=20
>>> U-Boot> pci 0
>>> Scanning PCI devices on bus 0
>>> BusDevFun  VendorId   DeviceId   Device Class       Sub-Class
>>> _____________________________________________________________
>>> 00.00.00   0x14e4     0x2711     Bridge device           0x04
>>>=20
>>> U-Boot> pci 1  =20
>>> Scanning PCI devices on bus 1
>>> BusDevFun  VendorId   DeviceId   Device Class       Sub-Class
>>> _____________________________________________________________
>>> 01.00.00   0x1106     0x3483     Serial bus controller   0x03
>>>=20
>>> So it does see the xHCI on the pci bus despite the
>>> "Bus xhci_pci: probe failed, error -110". -110 looks
>>> to be -ETIMEDOUT .
>>>=20
>>> Looking at the v2020.10/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c source
>>> code shows that the xhci_pci driver has:
>>>=20
>>> . . .
>>> static const struct udevice_id xhci_pci_ids[] =3D {
>>> 	{ .compatible =3D "xhci-pci" },
>>> 	{ }
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> U_BOOT_DRIVER(xhci_pci) =3D {
>>> 	.name	=3D "xhci_pci",
>>> 	.id	=3D UCLASS_USB,
>>> 	.probe =3D xhci_pci_probe,
>>> 	.remove =3D xhci_deregister,
>>> 	.of_match =3D xhci_pci_ids,
>>> 	.ops	=3D &xhci_usb_ops,
>>> 	.platdata_auto_alloc_size =3D sizeof(struct usb_platdata),
>>> 	.priv_auto_alloc_size =3D sizeof(struct xhci_ctrl),
>>> 	.flags	=3D DM_FLAG_ALLOC_PRIV_DMA,
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> static struct pci_device_id xhci_pci_supported[] =3D {
>>> 	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI, ~0) },
>>> 	{},
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> U_BOOT_PCI_DEVICE(xhci_pci, xhci_pci_supported);
>>>=20
>>> (It looks like the above driver is used as the default
>>> driver if no explicit match is found. It has been around
>>> for years.)
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> But, in the past when I showed the likes of fdt print /
>>> or translation to a .dts file, it did not have "xhci-pci"
>>> in compatible but had "generic-xhci" instead, such as:
>>>=20
>>>              xhci@7e9c0000 {
>>>                      compatible =3D "generic-xhci";
>>>                      status =3D "disabled";
>>>                      reg =3D <0x00000000 0x7e9c0000 0x00000000 =
0x00100000>;
>>>                      interrupts =3D <0x00000000 0x000000b0 =
0x00000004>;
>>>                      phandle =3D <0x000000d3>;
>>>              };
>>>=20
>>> For reference, for FreeBSD there is:
>>>=20
>>> # grep -ri "xhci-pci" /usr/src/sys/ | more
>>> # grep -ri "generic-xhci" /usr/src/sys/ | more
>>> /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/controller/generic_xhci_fdt.c:     =
{"generic-xhci",                true},
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm/bcm-nsp.dtsi:                  compatible =3D=
 "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm/bcm5301x.dtsi:                         =
compatible =3D "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/broadcom/stingray/stingray-usb.dtsi:      =
           compatible =3D "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/broadcom/stingray/stingray-usb.dtsi:      =
           compatible =3D "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-37xx.dtsi:                 =
           "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-cp11x.dtsi:                =
   "generic-xhci";
>>> /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-cp11x.dtsi:                =
   "generic-xhci";
>>>=20
>>> That FreeBSD generic_xhci_fdt.c match is from:
>>>=20
>>> static struct ofw_compat_data compat_data[] =3D {
>>>      {"marvell,armada-380-xhci",     true},
>>>      {"marvell,armada3700-xhci",     true},
>>>      {"marvell,armada-8k-xhci",      true},
>>>      {"generic-xhci",                true},
>>>      {NULL,                          false}
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> (End for-reference.)
>>>=20
>>> There is another driver in u-boot 2020.10, one that
>>> does mention "generic-" for xhci in
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-brcm.c :
>>>=20
>>> static const struct udevice_id xhci_brcm_ids[] =3D {
>>>      { .compatible =3D "brcm,generic-xhci" },
>>>      { }
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> U_BOOT_DRIVER(usb_xhci) =3D {
>>>      .name                           =3D "xhci_brcm",
>>>      .id                             =3D UCLASS_USB,
>>>      .probe                          =3D xhci_brcm_probe,
>>>      .remove                         =3D xhci_brcm_deregister,
>>>      .ops                            =3D &xhci_usb_ops,
>>>      .of_match                       =3D xhci_brcm_ids,
>>>      .platdata_auto_alloc_size       =3D sizeof(struct =
brcm_xhci_platdata),
>>>      .priv_auto_alloc_size           =3D sizeof(struct xhci_ctrl),
>>>      .flags                          =3D DM_FLAG_ALLOC_PRIV_DMA,
>>> };
>>>=20
>>> It is a new driver as of around 6 months ago and so is likely
>>> the one created for the RPi4B context.
>>>=20
>>> (Note the usb_xhci vs. xhci_brcm distinct namings of
>>> the driver.)
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> The .dtb files that I use for uefi/ACPI booting of FreeBSD
>>> and for u-boot based booting of ubuntu 2010.04.1 also use
>>> "generic-xhci", no "brcm," invovled.
>>>=20
>>> It seems that .dtb files that the u-boot folks expect for
>>> the RPi4B are vintages/variations that have compatible
>>> listing: "brcm,generic-xhci" .
>>>=20
>>> If one finds a .dtb with such, it might be close to what
>>> they were testing. With such a file, finding other
>>> differences with the .dtb files currently in use with
>>> FreeBSD could be done.
>>>=20
>>> I hope that the above helps.
>>=20
>> Looks like the u-boot.bin built includes "xhci-pci"
>> but excludes "brcm,generic-xhci": not in the output
>> of hd /usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-rpi4/u-boot.bin
>> after the port is installed.
>>=20
>> My initial guess would be that something more needs
>> to be specified to cause drivers/usb/host/xhci-brcm.c
>> (and possibly more) to be built and included.
>=20
> Looks like that was a bad guess, it still gets:
>=20
> No working controllers found
>=20
> based on instead having the "brcm,generic-xhci"
> driver (with a "generic-xhci" added to the
> compatibility list).

Having reverted back to u-boot 2020.10 without
compatibility list adjustments and with xhci-pci
in place again, trying a 4 GiByte RPi4 without a
microsd card boots as far as the rainbow square
on the monitor but hangs there, never displaying
even the:

U-Boot 2020.10 (Oct 09 2020 - 06:50:04 +0000)

notice.

By contrast, booted via the microsd card I
can stop it in u-boot 2020.10 and see things
like:

U-Boot> usb tree
USB device tree:
  1  Hub (5 Gb/s, 0mA)
  |  U-Boot XHCI Host Controller=20
  |
  +-2  Hub (480 Mb/s, 100mA)
  |     USB2.0 Hub=20
  | =20
  +-3  Vendor specific (5 Gb/s, 72mA)
  |    Realtek USB 10/100/1000 LAN 000000
  | =20
  +-4  Mass Storage (5 Gb/s, 0mA)
       OWC Envoy Pro mini <REPLACED>

So it gets farther with the 4 GiByte than with
the 8 GiByte.


But, for the "microsd card through kernel load"
style of boot, I've discovered that I can use the
more modern bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb that I use with
uefi/ACPI booting for u-boot based booting as
well. (This might have been true with the prior
2020.07 u-boot too. I did not go back and try it.)

The implication is that the older versions of
start4.elf and fixup4.dat are important for
u-boot 2020.10 for some reason: having newer ones
is what is different for failed microsd card
based boots. The start4.elf and fixup4.dat that
work with u-boot 2020.10 are too old for USB3
only based booting.


=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B3133D77-FA24-4F42-B529-D0B56F48E790>