From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  2 11:57:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA18579
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 11:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA18570
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 11:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0vJmBI-0000A0-00; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 12:56:36 -0700
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Subject: Re: Blargh - BSDI disk labels 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers),
        karl@Mcs.Net (Karl Denninger)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 02 Nov 1996 10:16:10 +0100."
		<199611020916.KAA27032@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
References: <199611020916.KAA27032@uriah.heep.sax.de>  
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 12:56:36 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0vJmBI-0000A0-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199611020916.KAA27032@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes:
: Do they perchance already use 16 partitions instead of 8?

Speaking of which, does anybody here know of any changes to the
NetBSD/OpenBSD base that would preclude FreeBSD from being able to
mount those disks?  I know of the disk label problem (in OpenBSD at
least), which should be relatively easy to fix, but are there others?

Warner