From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jun 25 23:57:07 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA28645
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 23:57:07 -0700
Received: from dns.netvision.net.il (root@dns.NetVision.net.il [194.90.1.5])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA28639
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 23:57:04 -0700
Received: from Burka.NetVision.net.il (root@Burka.NetVision.net.il [194.90.6.15]) by dns.netvision.net.il (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA28346; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 09:57:32 +0300
Received: from gena@NetVision.net.il (Burka.NetVision.net.il [194.90.6.15]) by Burka.NetVision.net.il (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA03978; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:10:18 +0300
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:10:18 +0300
In-Reply-To: <199506251824.UAA18975@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-ID: <XFMail.950626100804.gena@NetVision.net.il>
X-Face:  #v>4HN>#D_"[olq9y`HqTYkLVB89Xy|3')Vs<XpQKn_?U}en./<W?@-rH/+)Wj-@|6n_Oo)
 Li~B_?}Ay>9v58JQ*u-xEJVKY`xa.}E?z0RkLI/P&;BJmi0#u=W0).-Y'J4(dw{<wUBg4lk?f~:^$*
 ]uVJ8QL7?pkdpIzy$~}7dUNL:j`MJ!a)p{9['r7{ALM{x9V:i#B~N}LZ~+>"54NhSG|YYZG@[)(`e!
 >jN#L!~qI5fE-JHS+<
Organization: NetVision ltd.
X-Mailer: XFMail 0.2-Beta on FreeBSD
From: Gennady Sorokopud <gena@NetVision.net.il>
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>,
        J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: no bell under Xinside server
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, <current@freebsd.org>,
        <gena@NetVision.net.il>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Hello!

So what do you suggest to folks that still wants to use  Xinside
with syscons?

Advising things to Xinside folks sounds nice but...:-)

In message <199506251824.UAA18975@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes:
>As Bruce Evans wrote:
>> 
>> It went away in revision 1.88 1995/01/12 and I think it was broken in
>> syscons before that, so nothing should have been using it.
>> 
>> >+ #define CONS_XBELL      _IOW('t', 123, int[2])
>> 
>> Its name was CONSOLE_X_BELL in syscons and it still has that name in pcvt.
>
>Bing!  Rings a bell in me.
>
>No longer supported by newer pcvt's either.  It's old compatibility
>cruft from pccons, and pcvt used to implement the old pccons model for
>X11 support in order to ease the transition.  We've recently decided
>that it will no longer be #ifdef'ed in by default for the next pcvt
>release (which is to be out RSN).
>
>You should advise Xinside to use
>
>#define KDMKTONE        _IO('K', 8 /*, int */)
>
>instead.  It's supported by both, syscons and pcvt.  It's the SVRx
>compatible command, so they should have the code already handy for its
>implementation.
>
>-- 
>cheers, J"org
>
>joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
>Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

--------
 Gennady B. Sorokopud - System programmer at NetVision Israel.
 E-Mail: gena@NetVision.net.il
 Homepage: http://www.netvision.net.il/~gena

 This message was sent at 06/26/95 10:08:04 by XF-Mail