Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 08:50:41 -0500 From: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com> To: Erich Zigler <erichz@superhero.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threaded C++ Question Message-ID: <200101041409.JAA73970@pobox.rwwa.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jan 2001 13:10:12 CST." <20010102131012.A1922@superhero.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
erichz@superhero.org said: :-In reading through the archives I have seen several emails regarding :-the problems people have experienced with MySQL, and Mozilla on 4.2 :-systems. Why aren't serious problems like this reported in the 4.2 errata? (The term I've seen used here is "completely broken" for C++ threading.) Why even *have* an errata if, as seems to be the case, RELEASE users are expected to scan through zillions of messages in these mailing lists to get the information that naive people like me would expect to get in an errata listing? I propose that the following be added to the 4.2 errata: "The use of multithreading with C++ programs is completely broken in this release. No fix or workaround is available at this time." --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101041409.JAA73970>