Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:52:50 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 266236] ZFS NFS : .zfs/snapshot : Stale file handle
Message-ID:  <bug-266236-3630-ayi6A1SaAX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-266236-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-266236-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D266236

florian.millet@laposte.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |florian.millet@laposte.net

--- Comment #8 from florian.millet@laposte.net ---
We are hit by this problem as well.

I would add that the version of NFS used by the client has no impact, NFSv3=
 or
NFSv4 has the problem.

When FreeBSD changed from ZoF to OpenZFS 2.x in 13, there does seem to be a
change in the unmounting of the .zfs directory (see
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/os/freebsd/zfs=
/zfs_ctldir.c?h=3Dreleng/13.1
vs
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/f=
s/zfs/zfs_ctldir.c?h=3Dreleng/12.3)

a new function zfsctl_snapshot_unmount has been added in OpenZFS 2.x, and if
you compare it to the old zfsctl_umount_snapshot, the logic is quite differ=
ent.
Perhaps we have a regression here ?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-266236-3630-ayi6A1SaAX>