From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun 25  5:51:28 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0195114C09
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 05:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 10xVRC-00033l-00; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:50:34 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Aaron Smith <aaron-fbsd@arctic.org>
Cc: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, Doug <DougGuy@dal.net>
Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 05:44:06 MST."
             <199906251244.FAA30357@sigma.veritas.com> 
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:50:34 +0200
Message-ID: <11764.930315034@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 05:44:06 MST, Aaron Smith wrote:

> could you please restate the argument for this? i still haven't heard a
> decent reason for this sort of conf format perturbation.

I'm so tempted to say "me too". :-)

John Baldwin has suggested that he had functionality with inetd + tcpd
that he doesn't have any more with inetd + libwrap.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message