From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 13:54:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633A16A41F; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F9143D5E; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBEDslS4076387; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:54:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:54:47 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Lars Erik Gullerud In-Reply-To: <20051214144102.Q63851@electra.nolink.net> Message-ID: <20051214165127.B76252@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <000001c5fcaa$0988b040$04030201@misho> <439F3F1B.3050608@FreeBSD.org> <20051213220223.GA61287@xor.obsecurity.org> <2a41acea0512131632x23d068e2wb3d66c08e6741ac4@mail.gmail.com> <20051214020913.GA64113@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051214144102.Q63851@electra.nolink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: net@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , Jack Vogel , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: BUG: ip_output.c FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:54:50 -0000 On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, 14:43+0100, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:32:10PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > On 12/13/05, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:37:31PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > > Mihail Balikov wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > In FreeBSD 4.x in ip_output.c in part for ipfw local forwarding > > > > > > there's typo > > > > > > that will cause kernel panic: > > > > > > > > > > If you haven't already, this should be filed as a problem report. > > > > > > > > I don't know that there's a lot of point since 4.11 is in "legacy" > > > > mode and few developers still use it. > > > > > > The humorous thing is that althought I'm sure its true "few developers" > > > still use it, in places where it has actual commercial use, they are > > > still > > > using 4.x in large numbers. > > > > > > So bottom line... there is value in bugs being noted and filed :) > > > > Sure, I guess..as long as there aren't unrealistic expectations about > > someone fixing it. > > The original mail contained the patch that fixes the problem if I'm > not mistaken, so I guess the only expectations here are that someone > goes and commits it if the OP creates a PR with the patch... Which > shouldn't really be too unrealistic, should it? For the record: Gleb has fixed the issue a couple of days ago before you started this discussion :-) -- Maxim Konovalov