From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 01:28:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CBF16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC46043D54 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:28:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) iAA1TJSB030685; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:29:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Fernan Aguero In-Reply-To: <20041110011850.GB28553@iib.unsam.edu.ar> References: <20041109204948.GA1732@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <1100037439.17375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20041110011850.GB28553@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CuOLVtPfmlUfbBvvD8b2" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:28:45 -0500 Message-Id: <1100050125.17375.36.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: fixes and comments on the upgrade script procedure X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:28:50 -0000 --=-CuOLVtPfmlUfbBvvD8b2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 22:18 -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: > +----[ Joe Marcus Clarke (09.Nov.2004 18:56): > | > | On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 17:49 -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: > | > Hi! > | >=20 > | > I'm running the upgrade script since yesterday ... I hoped > | > to have it finished by now, but anyway ... since I had > | > some spare time, and lacking a better thing to > | > do I decided to read the upgrade script :)=20 > | >=20 > | > Attached is a diff with what I think should be corrected. > |=20 > | The comment diff is fine, but the other is not needed. You must have > | downloaded an old version of the script. >=20 > Probably ... i downloded it the day you posted the message > on the availability of gnome 2.8.1 in ports. >=20 > | > Also, it seems that though not explicitly specified in the > | > script, the upgrade procedure tried to rebuild openoffice. > | > This together with mozilla and firefox helps explain the > | > long time it is taking. Apart from the time issue, what > | > happened is that the attempt to build OOo made the upgrade > | > fail when /usr filled up. I never build OOo from sources, > | > and always use packages. I just don't have the space to > | > build such a monster. Perhaps it may be possible to perform a > | > 'dry-run' of the script, just checking what would be done > | > and thus allow the user to exclude some beasts? > |=20 > | Patches are welcome. However, you can also specify portupgrade flags t= o > | the script to attempt to upgrade from packages if available. > |=20 > | Joe > | > +----] >=20 > Yes, but these flags would affect all the ports, wouldn't > they? I've just listed openoffice-* in HOLD_PKGS based on > the suggestion by Adam W. Yes, they would affect all ports, but I don't think adding openoffice-* to HOLD_PKGS will help. We run portupgrade -f, and that bypasses HOLD_PKGS. Joe --=-CuOLVtPfmlUfbBvvD8b2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBkW7Nb2iPiv4Uz4cRAms0AJ9T4GyA4PNXqjh/uKJCavWGxlTUAACdHU1H oqHYsr4/kbugm4eKdyvj3Ww= =DdrU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CuOLVtPfmlUfbBvvD8b2--