Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
To:        stesin@gu.net
Cc:        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SVR4.2MP source code has become available recently?
Message-ID:  <199707252150.OAA02176@exit.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970726001142.1361D-100000@trifork.gu.net> from Andrew Stesin at "Jul 26, 97 00:20:07 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Stesin wrote:
> 	On UW. Solaris is SVR4.0 heavily modified by Sun,
> 	with SMP added by them independently; UW is SVR4.2 with
> 	SMP added by USL, am I right?  So they might have
> 	some (in theory, at least) interesting differences with regard to
> 	SMP implementation?

Uh huh.  Lots of good stuff there, even if only for an example of another
way to do things.  I personally prefer its SMP locking, but then I'm biased,
having used it for a few years.

> 	Then VXFS; binary compatibility stuff; drivers.

I doubt that it includes vxfs, that's Veritas' baby, and a separate thing.
I could be wrong, though.

> 	SCO is dropping old SCO OpenServer aka SVR3,
> 	in favor of SVR4.2MP-based system, I think; for now it's UW.
> 	And they have some kind of "unified driver interface" spec for UW.
> 	How nice would it be -- to have an ability to use hardware
> 	vendor's own drivers for UW, compatible with that spec,
> 	just out of the box.  Aaghh, dreams, dreams... :(

Unixware is basically heavily bug-fixed and enhanced SVR4.2ES/MP.
-- 
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707252150.OAA02176>