From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 13:23:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33631065679; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAC48FC1E; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E318A14DC627; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:23:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lrEJNVmamxZu; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:23:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-80-99-92-167.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F09214DC5FB; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:23:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C654757.2040804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:23:35 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-PT; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anonymous References: <4C6505A4.9060203@FreeBSD.org> <86mxsq693n.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86mxsq693n.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:23:41 -0000 Em 2010.08.13. 13:33, Anonymous escreveu: > Doug Barton writes: > > [...] > >> My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work >> recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* >> options and noticed that things were dramatically slower than the last >> time I tested those features. Thinking that I had made a programming >> mistake I dug into my code, and while the regexps that I was using could >> be tuned for slightly better performance the problem was not in my code. >> I then installed textproc/gnugrep to compare, and the differences were >> very dramatic using a highly pessimized test case (finding a match on >> the last line of INDEX). The script I used to test is at >> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/grep-time-trial.sh.txt and a typical >> result was: >> >> GNU grep >> Elapsed time: 2 seconds >> >> BSD grep >> Elapsed time: 47 seconds >> > Why not allow people to use grep(1) from ports in portmaster, e.g. by > not overriding user-specified PATH? > It would be a working solution but having seen the performance issue, it may also cause troubles elsewhere. Gabor