From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 10:42:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9F31065726 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from monthadar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27D08FC0C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1198425wyf.13 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:42:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1yUsDKvtPH5eBadjL6X+aPoTa9gPOP8/9Xz1csGZncc=; b=Ika+Oyqg6QlNB7/N9gI8UZlX5bPo1hsL8rOAnwdhvmCelzHyINNYukFHVH8mcPd0Pi DZ3kHGcD3ei4CQ0TJJqcAtoLyT5pmSSifuP4q4RmqbNSY5eq1BCCeUz7WUoFDUMJX2dI cbw5TE4n/p1dB//1O6+NHy7lu8SmKgj6qURgM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PwyV4QyMp4kg3TnzBv35vhdsKTH0Yj6yfE3ffXWhVXJPFiMUYQ6Mha6NtQIVzqRMrz TbnhXoYGR0zsfv3ZcCDvgb+cskYFxu3VA5Kbjl69yath+UeRwikoLEn5r8F3X3alZanx HYOwx1keJQFh8yE36j7xfYjwoSDA2Q+mFOhJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.137 with SMTP id x9mr7429045wbw.108.1297334525246; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:42:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.134.137 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:42:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102101119.07350.bschmidt@freebsd.org> References: <201102101119.07350.bschmidt@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:42:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: Monthadar Al Jaberi To: bschmidt@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 80211s HWMP problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:07 -0000 Okej, I run all four scenarios: 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost 1->3 OK, 2->0 OK, 3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2 looks like path is built correct in one way only? :S On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:06:41 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: >> Hej, wanna check if anyone encountered this problem: >> I setup 4 mesh nodes in a link topology ( 0 <-> 1 <-> 2 <-> 3) >> >> But I cant ping from 3 to 0, or 0 to 3, without first ping between >> the nodes to fill the hwmp route tables. > > Pinging 0 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 0 and 3 -> 1 on freshly started nodes works > though? > > -- > Bernhard > -- //Monthadar Al Jaberi