From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 21 01:01:41 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id BAA00934 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Dec 1994 01:01:41 GMT Received: from mailhost.tue.nl (mailhost.tue.nl [131.155.2.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA00926 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 1994 01:01:38 GMT Received: from asterix.urc.tue.nl (asterix.urc.tue.nl [131.155.5.10]) by mailhost.tue.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA11057 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 1994 22:04:15 +0100 Received: (from wmbfmk@localhost) by asterix.urc.tue.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9) id VAA00100 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Dec 1994 21:04:14 GMT From: Marc van Kempen Message-Id: <199412192104.VAA00100@asterix.urc.tue.nl> Subject: Still problems with 2.0 and 3c579 To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 22:04:14 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 701 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Despite suggestions to use the link? option to ifconfig I still can't get the 3c579 to run on FreeBSD 2.0. I finally tried an NE2000 I had lying around, and this worked flawlessly. So I think network configuration errors are not the problem. I don't know about EISA cards, but having the port at 0x1000 seems strange to me. Also while playing with the irq I noticed that a dos utility would report the irq at 0xf, while FreeBSD would only recognize the card when set to probe at 0xa. Changing the irq to 0xa with the EISA configuration utility would not really change anything. The card is still recognized, but still no go. If you need more information let me know, Regards, Marc.