Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:33:41 +0100 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux-flashplugin6 or 7 Message-ID: <200610240033.43211.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <17725.10145.650509.455063@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20061023182247.46621.qmail@web27411.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <17725.10145.650509.455063@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 23 October 2006 21:35, Robert Huff wrote:
> GeistTeufel writes:
> > so now, install linuxpluginwrapper to allow running linux plugin
> > on native programs
>
> While we're in the neighborhood of linuxpluginwrapper, I'd like
> to do some advocacy.
> While most folks are still using 5.* and 6.*, 7 is not /that/
> far off. As things stand now there's going to be a lot of hurting
> units when that day comes on account of
>
> .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700009
> IGNORE= doesn't support ELF symbol versioning, yet.
> .endifg
>
> It's not clear exactly what to do - a flood of messages to the
> maintainer may or may not have the desired effect - but it would be
> nice if people affected would install this on their mental map.
> (Maybe some qualified soul will even step up and fix the problem.
It wouldn't exactly be the end of the world. I had some problems with the
standard linuxpluginwrapper recipe, and Firefox, and ended up using
linux-opera, and after a few month with it I don't know that I don't actually
prefer it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610240033.43211.list-freebsd-2004>