From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 12:05:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D7616A41A; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FE813C480; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D74C2102; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:05:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9CC2155; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D5C6844A8; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:00:24 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: db References: <4700A791.6020606@encephalon.de> <20071001091106.GB35764@garage.freebsd.pl> <4700BC65.1000303@encephalon.de> <4700BE80.5080109@encephalon.de> <4700C441.30100@nipsi.de> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:00:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4700C441.30100@nipsi.de> (db@nipsi.de's message of "Mon\, 01 Oct 2007 11\:56\:17 +0200") Message-ID: <861wcf82p3.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: zpool does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:05:18 -0000 db writes: > We reported this months ago... :-( > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D104389&cat=3D > > could someone please verify and commit this fix? Both patches in the PR are incorrect. The second patch is better than the first, but still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the point of using an sbuf in the first place. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no