Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 02:51:06 -0600 From: "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1015836667.d15016@mired.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1015832287.8470f8@mired.org>, "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1015831171.a21ab0@mired.org>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. Message-ID: <15493.55418.457017.332630@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <90228.1015400542@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <15493.51038.957711.450030@guru.mired.org> <90228.1015400542@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> types: > In message <15493.51038.957711.450030@guru.mired.org>, "Mike Meyer" writes: > I'm advocating that the rule focus on readability rather than trying > to enforce a type which doesn't exist. Excellent idea. Can you provide verbiage and examples? Thanx, <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15493.55418.457017.332630>