From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 13:48:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A7816A4CE for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D6A43D3F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1BzFBS-000J0h-PJ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:48:26 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: Message from Giorgos Keramidas of "Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:12 +0300." <20040823133012.GB2918@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:48:26 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: <20040823134827.A0D6A43D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:48:28 -0000 > On 2004-08-23 16:21, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > On 2004-08-23 10:46, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > shouldn't > > > > NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW: > > > > now be 6.x ... > > > > > > Would something like this seem ok to you? It only mentions FreeBSD-CURRENT > > > instead of a specific version, so it will also work for FreeBSD 7.X when > > > that comes along. > > > > fine, but what if FreeBSD 7.X is actually faster ... :-) > > The word "slower" refers to the reduced speed of a system that runs with > a lot of debugging/test options enabled. The relative speed of the > release to the previous is (probably) of lesser importance for this > particular quote. > i agree, it's that once you take out the 'milestone', it might just become superflous, on the other hand 5.x is bad, so just current is fine - one less thing to check for.