Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:48:26 +0300 From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src/UPDATING Message-ID: <20040823134827.A0D6A43D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr> of "Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:12 %2B0300." <20040823133012.GB2918@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2004-08-23 16:21, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote: > > > On 2004-08-23 10:46, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote: > > > > shouldn't > > > > NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW: > > > > now be 6.x ... > > > > > > Would something like this seem ok to you? It only mentions FreeBSD-CURRENT > > > instead of a specific version, so it will also work for FreeBSD 7.X when > > > that comes along. > > > > fine, but what if FreeBSD 7.X is actually faster ... :-) > > The word "slower" refers to the reduced speed of a system that runs with > a lot of debugging/test options enabled. The relative speed of the > release to the previous is (probably) of lesser importance for this > particular quote. > i agree, it's that once you take out the 'milestone', it might just become superflous, on the other hand 5.x is bad, so just current is fine - one less thing to check for.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823134827.A0D6A43D3F>