From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 28 22:11:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A9B16A41F; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flata@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C94E43D46; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flata@magnesium.net) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1212) id 04910DA8B4; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:11:42 -1000 From: juli mallett To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20050828221142.GA71466@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200508251022.j7PAMWFO030767@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net> <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Towel: Yes Cc: juli mallett , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:11:43 -0000 * Tom Rhodes [ Date: 2005-08-26 ] [ w.r.t. Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ] > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:54:16 -1000 > juli mallett wrote: > > > * Tom Rhodes [ Date: 2005-08-25 ] > > [ w.r.t. cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ] > > > trhodes 2005-08-25 10:22:30 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > lib/libufs Makefile > > > Log: > > > Hook getino.3 up to the build and link it to putino.3. > > > > > > PR: 83820 > > > > This is wrong. As the PR states it was purposely not hooked up. > > inode.c doesn't have functions which look like the interfaces you've > > just published, and there isn't even a putino(3) in there. If the > > cause of the confusion is the manpage being listed in Xr's or > > something, then comment out the Xr's. This is very obviously wrong, > > if you try to use what's in the manpage I committed. Probably it > > shoudln't be in CVS at all. The reason I put it there at the time is > > that it was ready and inode.c was about ready to hit CVS, but that > > got dropped. Now, if you want to help me remember what P4 tree that > > inode.c was in, and pick up whereever I left off, that'd be awesome. > > Let me understand real quick, it was purposely not hooked up because > it was the only file not updated? I mean, I can back this out, > no problem; however, I fail to see why nothing is going on with > this code. No clue on the branch, sorry. It was purposely not hooked up because the code that it documents isn't in CVS.