Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:02:32 +0200 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/ca_root_nss: Remove duplicate PLIST entry Message-ID: <70575F09-E22B-4631-8180-E9CFFF418A5F@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <44a681dd-71cf-4946-bcdc-4928aeb02fd5@FreeBSD.org> References: <EAE8891D-0168-4879-BA59-067FAE37623F@lastsummer.de> <44a681dd-71cf-4946-bcdc-4928aeb02fd5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 19. Sep 2023, at 1:42 PM, Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > According to the commit log, those files are already handled by = @sample entries on pkg-plist so nothing is gonna change on final = package. Reading the commit message and discarding the bug report link aside, I think the point was the ambiguity between ETCSYMLINK turned on and off, and actually processing the resulting link as a file in the package to ensure consistency between the three symlinks provided (and not just the sample files). I'm still missing an argument for the change, best one backed up by a bug report raised. I'm sure "the lint pass told us it's not needed" tailored to an ideal world assumption where sample files are always considered their non-sample counter parts is an argument in the way that ca_root_nss tries to provide multiple files strapped over a sample keyword as a single point of truth. Cheers, Franco=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70575F09-E22B-4631-8180-E9CFFF418A5F>