From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul  1 16:43:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FD716A41C
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 16:43:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from steve@ion.lu)
Received: from linion.ion.lu (linion.ion.lu [80.90.47.168])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF73B43D55
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 16:43:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from steve@ion.lu)
Received: (qmail 2648 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2005 18:43:30 +0200
Received: from 80.90.37.202 by linion.ion.lu (envelope-from <steve@ion.lu>,
	uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms 
	(clamdscan: 0.81/685. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms.  
	Clear:RC:0(80.90.37.202):SA:0(-4.0/5.0):. 
	Processed in 8.06373 secs); 01 Jul 2005 16:43:30 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0
X-Antivirus-ION.LU-Mail-From: steve@ion.lu via linion.ion.lu
X-Antivirus-ION.LU: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(80.90.37.202):SA:0(-4.0/5.0):.
	Processed in 8.06373 secs Process 2636)
Received: from vodsl-1482.vo.lu (HELO ?192.168.0.21?)
	(relay@localhost.lu@80.90.37.202)
	by linion.ion.lu with SMTP; 1 Jul 2005 18:43:22 +0200
Message-ID: <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:42:11 +0200
From: Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu>
Organization: ION Network Solutions
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050405)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org,  dinoex@FreeBSD.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678"
Cc: 
Subject: FreeBSD Ports: webalizer/geolizer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:43:35 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is there any good reason having 2 different ports for these very similar
ports?

I have 1Patch to commit and that would mean twice the work. (Apart from
that the japanese addition from the "main" webalizer port aren't in
geolizer...)

WEBALIZER_GEOLIZER=yes make install

would't that be the solution?
also Geolizer is unmaintained and webalizer isn't.

Thanks,

Steve C

-- 
ION Network Solutions
Steve Clement
Unix System Administrator
209, rue des Romains
L-8041 Bertrange
Tel: +352 261 276-2
Fax: +352 261 276-9
mailto:steve@ion.lu
http://www.ion.lu


--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCxXJoMH8DIBsiCrgRA+ooAJwMWr1c5XC0zAzXoOiHKfprRMcOggCdFSRh
loZ6SzOXnY+FeoIk/bLAxBM=
=Ccbn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678--