From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 14:04:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D682B106564A for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BF88FC0A for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:04:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=lZe3X5hwf+Yb1vVUFF8tbXET8nYnxnSgAv9wDps+oY4=; b=PomoSk6ilQ9mA7gHNMeTeSUnbXyLyaktrQ4hBygt8b9FQ3biexyAseq9B9GqMFIqeG5VU3jzjK/E12Mh/nCfxs7f4Fe9ABaRk0PaCHx5hEX1c2/F8nHw0ItV4U56J7fg; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SmmfY-0002RW-Bk for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:04:37 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1341497066-94480-94479/5/88; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:04:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FF35864.5030109@FreeBSD.org> <20120704185104.GA42355@DataIX.net> <4FF4B36A.2040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:04:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4FF4B36A.2040608@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:04:38 -0000 On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:19:38 -0500, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/04/2012 11:51, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> What would be really nice here is a command wrapper hooked into the >> shell so that when you type a command and it does not exist it presents >> you with a question for suggestions to install somewhat like Fedora has >> done. > > I would also like to see this feature, which is pretty much universal in > linux at this point. It's very handy. > As long as it's completely optional, that'd be nice. Linux adds too much cruft to their shells. Ever try logging into an extremely highly loaded Ubuntu server? Takes forever to get your shell because of all the crap it runs to make things "pretty" for you. Linux foobar 2.6.31-14-generic-pae #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 15:22:42 UTC 2009 i686 To access official Ubuntu documentation, please visit: http://help.ubuntu.com/ System information as of Thu Jul 5 09:00:57 CDT 2012 System load: 0.08 Memory usage: 47% Processes: 81 Usage of /: 28.2% of 18.82GB Swap usage: 3% Users logged in: 0 Graph this data and manage this system at https://landscape.canonical.com/ 129 packages can be updated. 101 updates are security updates. $