From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 16 19:50:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net (h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net [24.69.46.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C1537B423 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:50:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael@tenzo.com) Received: from h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net (localhost.gv.shawcable.net [127.0.0.1]) by h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f3H2qb121642; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:52:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael@tenzo.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Michael O'Henly" Reply-To: michael@tenzo.com Organization: TENZO Design To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw vs. domestic tranquility... Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:52:37 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <200104170245.MAA04404@tungsten.austclear.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200104170245.MAA04404@tungsten.austclear.com.au> Cc: Tony Landells MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01041619523705.21220@h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 16 April 2001 19:45, Tony Landells wrote: > Personally, I prefer to log almost everything I deny so I can see > where traffic is being stopped, particularly when I'm first setting > things up. That's a good idea. I'll try that. Thanks! M. PS: Yes, I do have NATD set up and working properly -- that is, if I "allow all from any to any" the machines on the internal network are able to reach the net with no problem. -- Michael O'Henly TENZO Design To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message