From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 30 12:19:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6D416A47B for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfkorvem@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca (caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.186.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4C143D82 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfkorvem@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca) Received: by caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEE6A33C2E; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:19:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:19:17 -0400 From: Ben Korvemaker To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060630121917.GG46135@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20060629163256.GE46135@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca> <02829617@serv3.int.kfs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02829617@serv3.int.kfs.ru> X-Face: "c*(tD4>ppZ2.~$,F<81P?w)^9&*|($,^6W5}jc=M|-l)9W@HDGDesB?,VE'R|@u-W=/zi=mL?{.I[P&V9$YdV2O-RxdNkov_I_E0(.1a User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: linux-org-libs port downloading xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.1.src.rpm, not using it X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:19:26 -0000 On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:32:56 -0400 Ben Korvemaker wrote: > > > It's probably all my fault. [...] > > Seems that the "-p" option for portupgrade did it... Ah. Yep. My fault. I like to build binary packages, not for distribution, but for those occaisional times where it's useful to go back in time to quickly test a previous version when something goes awry. > We use linux libraries and as to GPL we should have sources together > with binaries. It was agreed that the best be can do -- to download > sources to those servers which have binary distfiles to > distribute. Thus those sources are downloading only when > PACKAGE_BUIULDING=YES is defined -- mainly for the FreeBSD package > building cluster. > > So when a standard user installs linux-xorg-libs from port or from > package (s)he doesn't get the sources. Make sense. > Fedora Core 4 has many xorg-libraries splitted functionally, but has > only one big file for the sources. :-( > > To avoid the sources fetching you may apply the next patch to > ports/Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk: Is the current situation likely to change? Or will I have to keep that patched? (and won't that patch get blown away every time i cvsup?) > But you should read GPL first. ;-) True. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Korvemaker Eagles may soar, but weasels don't bfkorvem@uwaterloo.ca get sucked into jet engines.