From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 13 22:22:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924E116A4CE for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:22:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ip209-154.digitalrealm.net (ip193-227.digitalrealm.net [216.144.193.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C195143D5E for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: (qmail 51138 invoked by uid 1003); 13 Oct 2004 22:23:10 -0000 Received: from laszlof@vonostingroup.com by ritamari.vonostingroup.com by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.65. Clear:RC:1(68.32.91.145):. Processed in 0.866654 secs); 13 Oct 2004 22:23:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?68.32.91.145?) (laszlof@vonostingroup.com@68.32.91.145) by ip193-227.digitalrealm.net with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 22:23:09 -0000 Message-ID: <416DAB2A.3060900@vonostingroup.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:24:42 -0400 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com> <20041013123840.GB1301@FreeBSD.org> <20041013193547.GB53895@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20041013193547.GB53895@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Eivind Eklund cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup Subject: Re: alternative options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:22:56 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: >On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:38:40PM +0000, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > >>On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:51:01PM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote: >>If you've got more *specific* problems with usability (like the batch >>build problem above), I'm very interested, as I'm trying to collect >>these for doing a new round of fixes for the options support in >>bsd.port.mk. >> >> > >BTW, has anyone started to impliment the NO__OPTIONS feature >that was requested? > > > That sounds like a great idea to me, I would definately like to devote some time to implementing such a feature if the demand is there. It doesnt sound like it would be very difficult to acomplish. And I'm glad to see someone shares my feelings on dialog's in ports :) Regards, Frank