From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 6 20:08:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA26656 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 20:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aries.bb.cc.wa.us ([208.8.136.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA26651 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 20:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by aries.bb.cc.wa.us (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA00296; Tue, 6 May 1997 20:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 20:02:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Coleman To: Ben Black cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Returned mail: Local configuration error (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 6 May 1997, Ben Black wrote: > chris: > > add the following line to your sendmail.cf, then kill and restart sendmail. > > Cwbb.cc.wa.us > > > b3n Thanks, I think that fixed it. My sendmail Guru is off on Paternity leave (his wife had a baby). I had all kind of problems with this new 3.0 upgrade. The installation went very smoothly (good job Jordan) But i had a hard time reconfiguring all the reconfigurations I had previously made. (mostly because of my confusion with the new rc.stuff) I think I am still having a few problems though. I didn't see the options ARP_PROXYALL in the LINT file? I just used my old kernel config file to rebuild a new kernel, and didn't have any compile problems, but I am getting complaints that ppp is not letting people through. Usually I just had to rebuild the kernel with ARP_PROXYALL enabled and things would work, Did this change with 3.0? Do I need to enable GATEWAY in the rc.conf? I think I like the rc.conf stuff, but I would like a list of the files that I can change and one of the ones that I should keep my hands off. The network setup stuff in the rc.conf didn't seem very apparent, it didn't have a "real" example of a net card like sysconfig had at one point. I would have liked an "ed0" example instead of just the localhost one. (commented out of course). I'll keep looking at the 3.0 "features" and give feed back. Should I direct such feedback to a different list. I usually only subscribe to -hackers. Thanks I really Appreciate this List. You put up with so much! --Chris Coleman