From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 17 06:12:41 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1985CFD076
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB7273DD3
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v6H6Cf4c078714
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:41 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 220786] audio/qjackctl: Update to 0.4.5
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-220786-13-XrUGRH1bEX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-220786-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-220786-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:42 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220786

--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #2)

I'm hinting that its highly beneficial to be more explicit and provide deta=
il,
which goes for everything related to issue/bug tracking. :) This is especia=
lly
the case non-trivial changes.

tldr: "Leave no (even potential) questions unanswered" makes it much less
likely an issue will be ignored and much more likely to promote
action/progress.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=