From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 8 12:46:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA02051 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 12:46:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.artcom.de (tui.artcom.de [192.76.129.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA02042 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 12:46:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hans@artcom.de) Received: by artcom.de via sendmail with stdio id for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 21:46:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 21:46:16 +0200 (CEST) From: hans@artcom.de (Hans Huebner) To: fmaruca@Omnia.com Subject: Re: ATM support? Newsgroups: artcom.mailing-list.freebsd.questions In-Reply-To: <0D962991BD00D211A18900A0C9C8391A03ADE0@OMNIA_3> Organization: Art+Com GmbH, Berlin, Germany Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Fran, In article <0D962991BD00D211A18900A0C9C8391A03ADE0@OMNIA_3> you write: >Does anybody know if BSD has any support for FORE OC3/OC12 or Efficient >OC3/OC12 pci adapters? There's support for the Efficient OC3 adapter in >Linux but I'd rather stick with BSD if at all possible. The Efficient ENI-155p is supported with -current. It does only support statically configured PVC's (no signalling), so it is useable only when all your peers are willing to install direct routes to your system. Does anyone know whether the BSD-ATM implementation interoperates with other CLIP implementations. Is the AAL5 encapsulation compatible to RFC1483? Thanks in advance, Hans To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message