From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  6 17:19:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA14080
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA14071
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id RAA14661 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <328138CB.41C67EA6@whistle.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 17:18:03 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: still no response
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I still haven't heard back from anyone regarding the
session limit addition in inetd.

does everyone think it's a boring idea?
doesn no one dislikr it?
should I just check it in?


(patch in previous email)

julian