From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 07:42:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F0B2CE for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergey.dyatko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39EE319 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d4so37519eek.8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:42:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mB0oNLgdrCkzwrCl9oaTC+aN9WHiAPYbB54im1n8Y7Y=; b=OlqBxx+SMaY8ZtZcCirBKIP7nD+7gfdkL1GxDC1OXsZN8s/ePHp68c3sBozqZj2kIU y6fZ4XhsZIvaGvktjKoXDPrpa53xBBSb4aZLh7JbZq1cokLmFjR7YeZE1tTTYvFQ8tyo f2XqpEz3glI4M7qaEEMWeKLymLP7vBasA+SYsuaeQ8JIOznin8V8YftcCpdhQNzvyLkD 4HdDk8CBqcslN57e/Lkh8hAzo5dPN3xxWCsLQMerQrUE2hTq4FBLaqez98TbF1qPsPKe 48sbUS704IuBl+RBdVv0pfhkMfRCR5cgaLqIaAvp4FbhAYwCqhf8h8ivNO3FDROnoHdC nj6A== X-Received: by 10.14.174.73 with SMTP id w49mr15468231eel.17.1359099731831; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop (m-s.agava.net. [195.222.84.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm393127eep.11.2013.01.24.23.42.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:42:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:42:12 +0300 From: "Sergey V. Dyatko" To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <20130125104212.6d51687f@laptop> In-Reply-To: References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130124093846.5e683474@laptop> <0c1603f1-a6af-4511-b230-8b791df7f9d7@email.android.com> <20130125090958.2700cc5b@laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:42:19 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Walter Hurry wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:09:58 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:06:47 -0800 Derek Kulinski > > wrote: > > > >> "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > >> > >> >You may: > >> >1/ install subversion on some host/jail 2/ do svn export ( f.e. > >> >svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9 stable_9) > >> >3/ tar it 4/ on 'client' fetch(1)/scp/rsync tarball > >> > > >> >in that case you don't need svn on 'client', fetch and scp in > >> >base :) > >> > >> If you go through all of that why not just install the damn svn > >> from ports? > > > > I have svn installed on all my boxes (for src and configs) ;-) > > > > > >> I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for > >> this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had > >> stable/9 branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process > >> went well until I rebooted the system, to see tons of errors in > >> pretty much everything that was compiled from ports. Instead > >> recompiling them from scratch I just decided to go ahead and > >> upgrade to 9.1 which was not officially released yet. > >> > > how in this case you would have helped availability lite-svn-client > > on base ? > > > >> And of course I could not perform svn sw because svn was broken > >> too. > > r232944 | lev | 2009-04-29 15:11:17 +0300 ... > > (3) Add STATIC option to build only static binaries [2] > > ... > > > >> And since svn has tons of dependencies it took me nearly an hour to > >> recompile them (portupgrade and Ruby were broken too). > >> > >> > > that's why I don't use portupgrade for a long time;-) > > use portmaster WTF > > Portupgrade works fine for me. What's the problem with it? > 1) "portupgrade and Ruby were broken too" from original email (yep, long time ago I faced with this too) 2) heavy depts(ruby) 3) don't know how it is now, but before it was supported weakly (large thread in ports@ (?) year or two ago, IIRC) -- wbr, tiger