From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 02:32:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1742F106566C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BE68FC1A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:32:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=ZDgn9vBMsC0bIbNrEjBtnMOFI568iDmu/DETvWLPLuY=; b=oVkcwkxxG9Czh2mHi8lajHDX7L6sN675guhM6elw9uzHh9nu+gX3ddAwYFfZpz0ikHXoXNalKPgreo/h42nxFK5E1y6mZws4nLTtyfPEb7adq+F/n2lw2DmBtoPH+fJ+; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S80UR-000HtX-GN for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:32:32 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1331778745-34990-34989/5/29; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:32:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A3@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:32:22 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:32:33 -0000 On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:26:23 -0500, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I must be thinking of our mailer trick then? > > I know i've seen it somewhere before. > > Alternatives sounds fun though? > I've seen several discussions on the bsd lists with everyone against the debian alternatives way. I don't know the history but I don't think it has much support. I assume it has to do with binaries passing through /etc via symlinks. I don't personally have much of an opinion on this.