Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:14:41 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql scaling questions Message-ID: <fle6vh$320$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <477A4E28.3010003@FreeBSD.org> References: <20071230134354.GA63555@harmless.hu> <4777A65C.8020406@FreeBSD.org> <20071230141118.GA67574@harmless.hu> <4777AB9C.1010003@FreeBSD.org> <flb6bp$8kq$1@ger.gmane.org> <4779BBE8.2050608@FreeBSD.org> <20080101122249.GA81405@harmless.hu> <477A32EA.4070500@FreeBSD.org> <ad79ad6b0801010534u3336c2d5l630c1d18a8a493cd@mail.gmail.com> <477A4BF1.3050709@FreeBSD.org> <20080101142116.GA94325@harmless.hu> <477A4E28.3010003@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE53DFCD3C388AE49FF39AA6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > That's why it's important to dig into the details of what the benchmark= > is actually doing before you conclude that "the numbers are higher for > linux, therefore it has faster syscalls". Can you propose a simpler syscall on the GENERIC kernel that could be used instead of getpid()? Unixbench is easily patched so the theory I put out can be easily checked. --------------enigE53DFCD3C388AE49FF39AA6C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHep8xldnAQVacBcgRAutQAJ0U0wGv/aEVuxXg3/2WK82vl6FXMACg3QY0 /VPJRSS+RO1wu3QEZcxpfy8= =MelS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE53DFCD3C388AE49FF39AA6C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fle6vh$320$1>