Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:20:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Edwin Culp <eculp@encontacto.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: slapd dumping core with today's current. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10209190910090.13977-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209190112470.10489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. > > I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that > 4.x statically compiled threaded binaries will not work right because > we've changed the kernel ABI in an incompatible way.. > We need to discuss this carefully when mini gets back to see if there is > a way out.. I brought this up with bde before. My suggestion was to create another sigreturn(), so we'd have osigreturn(), osigreturn2(), and [new] sigreturn(). He didn't like this. I think we'd need another sendsig() too. When mini adds setcontext() as a system call, this can make sigreturn() obsolete. The signal trampoline can call setcontext() instead of sigreturn() and sigreturn() can handle the old format... We still need a different sendsig() though. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10209190910090.13977-100000>