From owner-freebsd-isdn Thu Aug 24 13:39:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from peedub.muc.de (peedub.muc.de [193.149.49.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE537B422 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA31405; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 22:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200008242035.WAA31405@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Christian Haan Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i4b and CAPI Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:57:37 +0200." <200008231157.NAA91963@ep075.intego.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 22:35:25 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Christian Haan writes: > I would very much like to get a feedback to see how many people are intereste > d in a CAPI implementation for *BSD. > A CAPI implementation would be a good thing. It would allow us to finally support a number of active cards. The question is, how do we best implement it for FreeBSD ? I personally think that we should take advantage of the netgraph stuff to wedge a CAPI into place. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@muc.de gj@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message