Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:14:21 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel configuration/compilation tool Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950728171312.23040T-100000@aries> In-Reply-To: <v02130501ac3df3d5a30b@[199.183.109.242]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> Not today :-( Maybe next .... (sometime)
> But we should not be building any new mechanisms that are incompatible with
> that goal.
I don't see anything in the current model that inherently shuts
the door on non-Intel ports. Most of the stuff appears as either an
"option" or a "device", and those need to be specified no matter which
platform you choose to compile for.
--
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.950728171312.23040T-100000>