Date: 09 Nov 2000 18:05:31 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Jimmy <olgeni@uli.it>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, pine@freebsd.ady.ro, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.2 BETA ISO image Message-ID: <vqcpuk4eg44.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <21255.973810192@winston.osd.bsdi.com> (Jordan Hubbard's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 14:49:52 -0800") References: <olgeni@uli.it> <21255.973810192@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> * Argh. People keep making ports interactive for "security" reasons * but then forget that interactive packages are not handled by sysinstall * and should be marked IS_INTERACTIVE so that I can keep them off the CD. * * I'll remove the pine port from the final CD image, but this goes for any * other ports which do the same thing. :-( Ports marked IS_INTERACTIVE won't be packaged at all for obvious reasons -- I won't be able to hit return for packages built from cron. :) Perhaps sysinstall should be fixed? If that is not possible, we can introduce a new fixed comment that you can grep for or something. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcpuk4eg44.fsf>