From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Oct  2 11:16:14 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA13198
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 11:16:14 -0700
Received: from hermes.intel.com (hermes.intel.com [143.183.152.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA13193
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 11:16:11 -0700
From: olsenc@ichips.intel.com
Received: from ichips.intel.com by hermes.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Mon, 2 Oct 95 11:14:33 -0700
Received: from dtt034 by ichips.intel.com (5.64+/10.0i); Mon, 2 Oct 95 11:14:16 -0700
Received: by dtt034.intel.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/10.0i); Mon, 2 Oct 1995 11:14:13 -0700
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 11:14:13 -0700
Message-Id: <9510021814.AA35311@dtt034.intel.com>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: If not gets(), then what?
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello:

I have a program that uses gets(), and FreeBSD complains about it.
I read the manpage on gets(), and it says it's dangerous, but yet
it doesn't mention any alternatives!

Suggestions, recommendations, testimonials, confessions?

Btw, FreeBSD 2.0.5 RELEASE is rock solid.  Very nice job, you guys!
It was nice to finally get rid of Linux.

Thanks,

-Clint