From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 30 01:20:17 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA18052
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 01:20:17 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA18022
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 01:19:02 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA26623; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:14:16 +1000
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 18:14:16 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199508300814.SAA26623@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, piero@strider.ibenet.it
Subject: Re: Gritching about XFree86 and serial port naming
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, peter@nmti.com
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> >Oh yeh, the docs should have something in big bold letters about linking
>> >/dev/mouse to /dev/cuaa0 under whatever name it ends up as...
>> 
>> That would be bogus.  X works with the vanilla POSIX port ttyd0 and
>> always has.

>I'd  not  say  it's  "bogus".  Maybe  it's redundant, or strictly
>speaking "unnececessary", but as I suggested on -install I  think

I meant cuaa0 would be bogus.  Who runs getty on their mouse port?

Bruce