From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  6 04:11:18 2010
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id B04951065672; Wed,  6 Jan 2010 04:11:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:11:18 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20100106041118.GA91881@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201001040916.o049GZ1Y013061@svn.freebsd.org>
	<4B4384E3.2080600@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100105152300.eb7a66d1.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<4B43D346.4020900@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100105162447.7deac6d7.stas@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100105162447.7deac6d7.stas@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,
	Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r201477 - head/games/fortune/datfiles
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:11:18 -0000

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:47PM -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> from what I see from dictionaries "invasion of smth" could mean both
> the action by smth, and action against smth.  Is "invasion to"
> grammatically incorrect?

I'm far from being an expert either, but invasion is clearly "of".
It can help to think of embracing, not intrusion.  Also, simple Google
check for "invasion of" vs. "invasion to" kinda proves the point.

./danfe

P.S.  OK, I admit, I'm too drunk to give technically-backed answer; "of"
just sounds right to me.