From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 22 15:56: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018BE37B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:55:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2MNtiB36368; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 02:55:44 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 02:55:43 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Martin Blapp Cc: Peter Wemm , Alfred Perlstein , Daniel , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FIX] Re: CFS - Portmap Message-ID: <20010323025542.A36278@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200103222342.f2MNgGh76684@mobile.wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mb@imp.ch on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:49:33AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 00:49:33 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > Breaking nfs from working on user defined ports is a step backwards and > > should be fixed. Lots of people run nfsd and cfsd at the same time. > > No, you understand me wrong, the way this is done is bogus. If you set > -DCFS_PORT=3049 like it is done at the moment and use nc instead of NULL > it works. To have a NULL nc entry is not correct in tirpc. So the question is: why cfsd attempts to register with NULL netconfig for ports != 2049? What it wants to obtain by such move? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message