Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:19:58 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        perforce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 22623 for review
Message-ID:  <20021222231958.GA1414@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20021222.150927.83284721.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <200212221912.gBMJCf5i009504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021222.150927.83284721.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 03:09:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <200212221912.gBMJCf5i009504@repoman.freebsd.org>
>             Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> writes:
> : 	Convert to the new sioprobe/sioattach interface. While here,
> : 	remove the sio_pci_unit_kludge function. We consider this the
> : 	"future" version which according to the comment makes it
> : 	obsolete :-)
> 
> It is not obsolete.  There's no way to say that the ISA serial ports
> have reserved sio0 and sio1 so that the pci serial port should attach
> to sio2 or sio4.  Until there is, this kludge is needed.

Can you tell me why or when this would be useful?

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021222231958.GA1414>