From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 25 7:51:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from survis.surfnet.nl (survis.surfnet.nl [192.87.108.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181937B6A4 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:51:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from zuurtje.surfnet.nl ([192.87.109.5]) by survis.surfnet.nl with ESMTP (exPP) id 14Lofq-00032R-00; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:50:58 +0100 Received: from sure.surfnet.nl (sure.surfnet.nl [192.87.109.131]) by zuurtje.surfnet.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/ZUURTJE-0.8) with ESMTP id QAA04311; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:50:57 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:50:57 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald van der Pol To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: Feico Dillema , Matt Dillon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 3974) Re: TI-RPC, IPv6 and NFS (was: Re: strong recommendation re: NFS) In-Reply-To: <27117.980432571@coconut.itojun.org> Message-ID: X-NCC-RegID: nl.surfnet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 itojun@iijlab.net wrote: > >I don't think this is within the KAME-project scope. On NetBSD, the > >NetBSD crowd has done this almost a year ago (I believe) and NFS over > >IPv6 works just great on NetBSD. I'd guess FreeBSD could borrow a lot > >from the NetBSD work, reducing the major-ness of the task? > > The above is correct. NetBSD NFS-over-IPv6 (actually RPC over IPv6) > is TI-RPC based, and it was done by NetBSD guys not KAME guys. Sorry, I was not clear. The question about moving towards TI-RPC was directed to freebsd-current. Just out of interest. No critisism intended. rvdp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message