From owner-freebsd-security Sun May 23 16:37:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8E514DE5 for ; Sun, 23 May 1999 16:37:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA27944; Sun, 23 May 1999 17:37:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.37.19990523173630.0469dd60@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.37 (Beta) Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 17:37:14 -0600 To: "Michael Bryan" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Denial of service attack from "imagelock.com" In-Reply-To: <199905231430560660.0E88073E@quaggy.ursine.com> References: <199905231424140440.0E81E3D5@quaggy.ursine.com> <4.2.0.37.19990522105949.0465d4a0@localhost> <4.2.0.37.19990522105949.0465d4a0@localhost> <4.2.0.37.19990523131810.04669d30@localhost> <199905231424140440.0E81E3D5@quaggy.ursine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 02:30 PM 5/23/99 -0700, Michael Bryan wrote: >So they are responsive to requests to be put on their "don't scan me" >list. That doesn't change the fact that their scanning methods are >on the harsh side, but at least you can get them to stop scanning your >network without adding another firewall rule. You are assuming that they are as good as their word. I am not entirely sure that I trust them. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message