From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 10 05:53:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18356CD7FC8 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D036F1CF4 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 43a7deca TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:53:10 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: Can't set maintainer-approval+ flag on an attachment From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <705473bd-9e65-ff1e-1a2d-9111854ff87d@bluerosetech.com> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:53:08 -0700 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <025A28A9-0B23-456A-A7BB-E78B76CAF7FE@adamw.org> References: <705473bd-9e65-ff1e-1a2d-9111854ff87d@bluerosetech.com> To: Mel Pilgrim X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:53:12 -0000 > On 9 Feb, 2017, at 18:51, Mel Pilgrim = wrote: >=20 > A PR for a port I maintain includes a patch. I'm supposed to set the = maintainer-approval flag to + to approve the patch, but it doesn't seem = to be working. When I go to the patch details page, I can set = maintainer-approval+, but it doesn't stick, even if I include a comment. = I found an older thread[1] from this list which mentions the patch has = to be set to maintainer-approval? with my email address before I'm able = to set maintainer-approval+. The patch did not have = maintainer-approval? set. Is that bug still unfixed? >=20 > 1: = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-March/098255.html Which PR? # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org