From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Aug 29 23: 1:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from nttdtec.co.jp (atom.nttdtec.co.jp [210.161.252.51])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 9F51A1510A; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ryuichiro.imura@nttdtec.co.jp)
Received: from mail0.nttdtec.co.jp by nttdtec.co.jp (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA07515; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:58:06 +0900
Received: from imurar.nttdtec.co.jp ([192.168.16.99]) by mail0.nttdtec.co.jp (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2  (693.3 8-11-1998)) with SMTP id 492567DD.002061F3; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:53:42 +0900
Message-ID: <001501bef2ac$fd7d5a20$6310a8c0@imurar.nttdtec.co.jp>
From: "=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCMGZCPBsoQiAbJEJONTBsTzobKEI=?=" <ryuichiro.imura@nttdtec.co.jp>
To: "Steve Price" <sprice@hiwaay.net>,
	"Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami" <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: "Chris Piazza" <cpiazza@home.net>,
	"FreeBSD Ports" <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:00:40 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MimeMultipartBoundary"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

--MimeMultipartBoundary
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> * From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
>
> * # Err, misread that.  It is not at all compatible with qt-1.4x
> * 
> * Speaking of incompatible and repository copies... Does anyone
> * but me think it would be a good idea to put this port in a
> * directory like qt200 instead of qt2, since we've had a history
>
>Great idea.  I was going to suggest this myself after getting Chris's
>response, but you beat me to it. :)
>
>So, what's it going to be?  It's qt-2.0.1 now, so is qt201 ok, Chris?
>
>Satoshi

Qt says
 2-VER_MAJ
 0-VER_MIN
 1-VER_PATCH

so, next Qt-2.0.2, Qt-2.0.3... shuld be compatible, I think.
Qt renames but directory name remains, it seems strange, isn't it?
I think qt20 is better.

-----
R. Imura

--MimeMultipartBoundary--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message