From owner-freebsd-smp  Wed Jul 29 09:13:47 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23395
          for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from wrath.cs.utah.edu (wrath.cs.utah.edu [155.99.198.100])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23388
          for <freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu)
Received: from fast.cs.utah.edu (fast.cs.utah.edu [155.99.212.1])
	by wrath.cs.utah.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA29665;
	Wed, 29 Jul 1998 10:13:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by fast.cs.utah.edu (8.6.10/utah-2.15-leaf)
	id KAA26053; Wed, 29 Jul 1998 10:13:01 -0600
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 10:13:01 -0600
From: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu (Kevin Van Maren)
Message-Id: <199807291613.KAA26053@fast.cs.utah.edu>
To: rv@plig.net
Subject: Re:  SMP on dual porcessor Compaq
Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

My first guess would be this:
> Processors: APIC ID Version State           Family  Model   Step    Flags
>              0       0x10    BSP, usable     6       2       1       0x0381
>              0       0x10    AP, usable      6       3       4       0x80fbff

You can't have two processors with the same ID.  I'd check to see what
the flags mean, too.

Kevin Van Maren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message