From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 11 18:40:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA20400 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 18:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from kakapo.pinnacle.co.nz (pinsoft.internet.co.nz [202.37.141.181] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA20395 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 18:40:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@pinnacle.co.nz) Received: from tui.pinnacle.co.nz (tui.pinnacle.co.nz [202.37.163.3]) by kakapo.pinnacle.co.nz (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04225; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 15:41:50 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from localhost (jonc@localhost) by tui.pinnacle.co.nz (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA24005; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 15:41:46 +1300 (NZDT) X-Authentication-Warning: tui.pinnacle.co.nz: jonc owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 15:41:45 +1300 (NZDT) From: Jonathan Chen To: Guy Helmer cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Java 1.1 illegal instruction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Guy Helmer wrote: > I've tried using the kwhite port of java 1.1 to FreeBSD on my 2.2-stable > system, and whenever I run java or javac, I receive an "illegal > instruction". Yes, I have removed the jdk1.1/lib/font.properties file > (actually, I just renamed it to font.properties.ORIG -- could that really > be the problem?). Also, libc.so.2.2 is in /usr/lib/compat (not /usr/lib) > -- could that be a problem? There's an update patch on kwhite's page that removes dependencies on /usr/lib/compat, that can be run on 2.2.x systems. Try downloading the script and running it on your system. -- Jonathan Chen Once is dumb luck. Twice is coincidence. Three times and Somebody Is Trying To Tell You Something.