From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 8 09:26:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2BFAEE8C for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F1D7870A for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q72-v6so5366184itc.0 for ; Tue, 08 May 2018 02:26:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t5rG1LN8Zcewlb+5K9z9MFsZN5wNKyjKd91tGmOiCqo=; b=LhDM0aNGnFjgnksjeAUjU4DZJQ8Xb/juiGM1DVzCe88gY/pdgTpVasxRF/WJlXc/mZ bVFLF/kTnKLqdjBc3PVVTgvsX0e3kAMd5GTitz272vk2cazfZjD3XN433kmRBDeKrQQZ 1TvZXm0ncT4q6LleCSsKzONSIx6Sn/UaAmE1w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t5rG1LN8Zcewlb+5K9z9MFsZN5wNKyjKd91tGmOiCqo=; b=b/bub/CovB/goHVuCuovReQmcrmPvXMX3hBnNTWiVGAvF4flwyRzXJ7nRFILE4wM6i PPKUwqu3AXS8Oyqm3q7gO+99fjzh0VmXC9WIWHUnXcaScfbdtqv+birM1RnHZxEI8eD1 GduvQCuK6KibLUPtQMqMCNWJtrtmyoj0Y8QgWb1+e8GF8hUwQiGDWo2V5nr46Xj1NH9T kyOC2rFB3pPJgkKkw6YUK0fsYGLcahcrsr+kNLLIMQiNlaDSvr+A98Wq8w/t7q3vrSTX lB88yfIGRT92EANPvSxnVLRUitn6w6RiF1ARuAukKsHfPEGZkbX/Pbu77L7Nx3VFDSM0 1C7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc2Uwb3D4PMVmf5dMgOiwf8Us7B+YqklVcRyh0h0cyuJ7U2ybvN AGkDcY/797P8NoqwhM2GKr7OeRL8DQ3vq0cHFysfaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrsUeMMQlpkbcJrN0lmXZpd+6/JWayw/DS/yIU6hCTEnepc3FsIggGI6uM2pI65WLbzXYFNHHq35zLB0ZzXmjs= X-Received: by 2002:a24:f9cc:: with SMTP id l195-v6mr4999778ith.132.1525771565099; Tue, 08 May 2018 02:26:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:9049:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2018 02:26:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> References: <201805072142.w47LgN1R041002@repo.freebsd.org> <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> From: Kevin Bowling Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 02:26:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys To: Harry Schmalzbauer Cc: Stephen Hurd , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 09:26:06 -0000 iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time. You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions. Regards, Kevin On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wro= te: > Bez=C3=BCglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 07.05.2018 23:42 (localtime)= : >> Author: shurd >> Date: Mon May 7 21:42:22 2018 >> New Revision: 333338 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333338 >> >> Log: >> Merge iflib changes to 11-STABLE >> >> MFC r300147, r300153, r300154, r300215, r301563, r301567, >> r302372, r307560, r307562, r307563, r307568, r308792, r311039, >> r311837, r312755, r312903, r312905, r312924, r313248, r315217, >> r315245, r315288, r316278, r316281, r316502, r316596, r317756, >> r319917, r319921, r319984, r319989, r320059, r320609, r320611, >> r321253, r321629, r321630, r322337, r322338, r322823, r323077, >> r323825, r323876, r323879, r323887, r323941, r323942, r323943, >> r323944, r323954, r324038, r324318, r324937, r325166, r325167, >> r325168, r325201, r325241, r325245, r325487, r325494, r325901, >> r326033, r326369, r326370, r326432, r326577, r326578, r326702, >> r326706, r326775, r327013, r327017, r327052, r327072, r327098, >> r327242, r327244, r327247, r329651, r329742, r330289, r330715, >> r330721, r332419, r332422, r332729 >> >> Reviewed by: sbruno >> Approved by: re (delphij@) >> Sponsored by: Limelight Networks >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15142 > > Thanks to all for all your hard work pushing iflib. > > Unfortunately I haven't had time to check if EM_MULTIQUEUE suffers from > a regression with iflib =E2=80=93 previous em-attached NICs 2nd queue sup= port. > At least one i217 I'm using -current with, uses only one queue. But that > was igb, not em, so I'm wondering if i217 ist limited to 1 queue =E2=80= =93 at > least i210 supports 4 queues... hints welcome. > > But I have several oldish machines with hartwell (82574L, still running > 10-stable), which showed much better delivery if multiple line speed > clients were generating load and EM_MULTIQUEUE added support for 2 > queues (and ULE on SMP machine...). > > I'm also unsure about the current netmap state. When I last checked > (some months ago), igb(->em)/netmap didn't work. If netmap support was > restored, I missed that. > > Can you confirm that if EM_MULTIQUEUE and netmap are supposed to be > still working with all the adapters which were supported by previous > stable-11 (em+igb) code? > Or do we need bold release notes that igb/em users must be aware of > significant changes? > > Thanks, > > -harry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"