From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 19:55:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366A6106566B for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe01.c2i.net [212.247.154.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40248FC08 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:55:08 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 Received: from [176.74.212.201] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe01.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 289967046; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:53:33 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: animelovin@gmail.com Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:52:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201206151819.32398.hselasky@c2i.net> <4FDB6AA3.3040606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDB6AA3.3040606@gmail.com> X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206172152.55303.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:55:09 -0000 On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelovin@gmail.com wrote: > Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier > to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP > was the basic unit in Internet based networking but feel free to correct > me if you have any news I might have missed... :) > > Also do you have any idea why AMD based CPUs could be vulnerable to this > alternative networking scheme and cause a remote denial service in fbsd > stable but not in CURRENT? > > Thanks, > > Etienne Hi, I loose packets because I use a WLAN adapter. Sometimes the link is down for various reasons, and then the routes start changing for manually created routes, and I want to prevent that. --HPS