Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 07:29:10 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSSAPI and Heimdal in Base Message-ID: <5304B1A6.2070801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BQLa9AdWTtR_UHcVZ5jZ%2BgDEXER_03v5m=6Y5xL-1WQBDzNsQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BQLa9DNsmOLn7fquzga7kB_j08Ss36DHokCYAcPL7BG=PfeZg@mail.gmail.com> <530203DA.4050108@heuristicsystems.com.au> <CA%2BQLa9AdWTtR_UHcVZ5jZ%2BgDEXER_03v5m=6Y5xL-1WQBDzNsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8abNlNlu2eLgLT0To197EwlX7RsGl0qgS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/17/2014 5:23 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > Actually both port and base are 1.5.2. Base was updated in Apr 2012: > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D234027 >=20 > Both 9.x and 10.0 have Heimdal 1.5.2, same version in ports. >=20 > The Heimdal project's current stable version is actually 1.5.3. They > have forgotten to update their main website, but the Git repository > speaks the truth: > https://github.com/heimdal/heimdal/blob/master/NEWS >=20 > Also, they are pushing out 1.6 release candidates at the moment, so I > think 1.6 should arrive shortly. >=20 > I will give the project a poke and see if they can update their > website, but security/openssh-portable should build fine against > heimdal base or the heimdal port since they are identical. I will take another look, however I could not get it to build with the base heimdal so I marked it broken. >=20 > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Dewayne Geraghty > <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote: >> Robert, >> There's a couple of versions different. Heimdal from ports is 1.5.2. >> I'm writing personally because I don't build any systems with the >> heimdal in base, but I recall it being around 1.0.1 on 9.X. >> >> As an aside I recall the openssh developer mentioning somewhere that >> gssapi wasn't supported in openssh 6.5, but if it builds for you then >> you're probably running an earlier version of the ports system? It's >> also helpful to let folks know what FreeBSD version you're discussing = ;) >> >> Cheers, Dewayne >> >> On 17/02/2014 5:14 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >>> When building openssh-portable, and enabling kerb_gssapi, but using >>> the heimdal that is in base, it gives the error: >>> KERB_GSSAPI Requires either MIT or HEMIDAL, does not build with base >>> Heimdal currently >>> >>> What is the difference between base and the port of Heimdal? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --8abNlNlu2eLgLT0To197EwlX7RsGl0qgS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTBLGmAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPg0YH/0m2qg6BcqaBH4l7ih1rjU4N ZSbMJcG0JSbz1f5fXLmnmkm0XxQsValKGt3zillXTFsLPD3W3dPqERmcq3qfvyKa Pzlt4orQytbBrncM+jyDRTfR29RQA7GNOVnr+maf4YWP15r5goQekcCTAloXpK4O PbSp+f68/T/4zgtOIvwqUjejW97JpxoN1118Vj4V0PghuIaYPH5SKB2+HQbVGQIX gkCyliH+/rnaF9fSzwuJm/WTLIbnUNRZwOVtTpsW/yDPBsByxSsgnSOLtaJ/QXNl 6cko41aKf20kcuXFmPCZYPXS0QzUhmUiG/MCE0FzE0U4E/0qr5uIb6Vv1sbar98= =rUEJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8abNlNlu2eLgLT0To197EwlX7RsGl0qgS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5304B1A6.2070801>