Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:32:28 +0200 From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster deletes failed ports Message-ID: <20060908203228.GM89080@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4501CAC9.3060607@FreeBSD.org> References: <44FC4303.4050600@gmail.com> <200609042118.09134.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <44FC9527.6000802@gmail.com> <200609050048.57718.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20060905104831.GF89080@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> <44FDAF66.7090701@FreeBSD.org> <op.tff6qjqvzq5pz4@sovaio.netoldies.com> <60494.24.71.118.34.1157599049.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> <20060907042838.GA61492@nowhere> <4501CAC9.3060607@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > Craig Boston wrote: ... >> Though I still think "leaf ports" and "root ports" should be listed >> together. > > I have gone back and forth on that a few times myself. Does anyone > else have an opinion? I like the difference. Maybe because I also like 'pkg_tree -v' and 'pkg_tree -t -q' and the dependency graph tool from Garrett Wollman (at http://people.freebsd.org/~wollman/portdeps.pl) together with graphviz. It generates output like http://lambermont.dyndns.org/freebsd/ports.png (my setup) where the root ports are the upper-left boxes and the leaf ports are the right-side boxes. Ports that are depended on are ellipses. groetjes, Hans Lambermont
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060908203228.GM89080>